On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote:
> >> reviewing your patch
> > Current status is this:
> > * My understanding is that Dave and Andrew (and therefore Simon) think
> > the approach proposed here is an acceptable one. Heikki disagrees and
> > wants different approach. Perhaps I misunderstand.
> > * Patch needs work to complete the proposed approach
> > * I'm willing to change the patch, but not able to test it on Windows.
> I thought the latest conclusion was that changing the behavior of
> pg_standby itself wouldn't address the problem anyway, and that what we
> need is just a docs patch recommending that people use safe copying
> methods in their scripts that copy to the archive area?
Plus the rest of this patch, which is really very simple.
pg_standby currently waits (on Windows) for the sleep time. We agreed
that this sleep would be on by default, but optional.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: