> > Howdy!
> >
> > I'm converting an application to be using postgresql instead of oracle.
> > There seems to be only one issue left, batch inserts in postgresql seem
> > significant slower than in oracle. I have about 200 batch jobs, each
> > consisting of about 14 000 inserts. Each job takes 1.3 seconds in
> > postgresql and 0.25 seconds in oracle. With 200 jobs this means several
> > more minutes to complete the task. By fixing this I think the
> > application using postgresql over all would be faster than when using
> > oracle.
>
> Have you tried COPY statement?
I did that now. I copied all 3 million rows of data into a text file and
executed the COPY command. It takes about 0.25 seconds per job. So that's
much better. I'm afraid jdbc doesn't support COPY though. But now I know
what the theoretical lower limit is atleast.
Should it be possible to get anyway nearer 0.25s from my current 1.3s?
Tim
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
