btw... my goal is to achieve this: 

http://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2013/06/11/inside-darcula-look-and-feel-an-interview-with-konstantin-bulenkov/

(as Phil suggested some time ago, in a thread which was the reason I started to 
try a dark theme). 

Also... my intention is to contribute to clean a bit morphic by removing silly 
hardcode stuff and creating a separation betweek "skin" and "morph"... and more 
important, to easy the creation of new skins. 

 but I still do not find a design that satisfy me... we'll see. 

Esteban

On Nov 20, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:

> ok... I will package it and made it available in the course of the day then.
> more hands means faster results :)
> 
> Esteban
> 
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 14:42, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> :)
>>> 
>>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 2.40.12 PM.png>
>>> 
>>> I'm slowly working in a darktheme... problem is the INCREDIBLE amount of 
>>> hardcode colors and silly code. 
>>> So it will take some time until is ready (also because I work on it when 
>>> I'm bored and not wanting to do what I should do... like today :P)
>> 
>> Hey, Esteban, that looks already quite impressive.
>> I am sure there are some people really anxious to try this and help.
>> Is this theme already available somewhere ? 
>> 
>>> Esteban
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:34 PM, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> yes I can confirm that this work also on windoom 7. Indeed Sven your Pharo 
>>>> looks a bit more sexy than mine. 
>>>> 
>>>> the code you posted works also like a charm for me , thank you. Now If I 
>>>> could get also a dark theme working with pharo that would be awesome. All 
>>>> this white hurts my eyes. But I guess I will have to compromise for the 
>>>> time being :)
>>>> 
>>>> thank you  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:46, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Sven.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What version are YOU using? Fonts and windows look so clean an sharp! :)
>>>> 
>>>> ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> Yes they are.
>>>> 
>>>> Like I said, Pharo version #30582
>>>> 
>>>> defaultFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>>> listFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>>> menuFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>>> windowTitleFont Source Sans Pro Bold points: 12 height: 21
>>>> balloonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
>>>> codeFont Source Code Pro Normal points: 11 height: 19
>>>> buttonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>>> haloFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
>>>> 
>>>> Installed with a script from our local look and feel guru, Doru:
>>>> 
>>>> #('SourceCodeProRegular' 'SourceCodeProBold' 'SourceSansProRegular' 
>>>> 'SourceSansProBold’)
>>>> do: [ :each |
>>>>   Smalltalk globals
>>>>     at: each asSymbol
>>>>     ifAbsent: [
>>>>       Gofer new
>>>>         smalltalkhubUser: 'girba' project: 'FreeFonts';
>>>>         package: each;
>>>>         load ].
>>>>   (Smalltalk at: each asSymbol) new install ].
>>>> FreeTypeSystemSettings loadFt2Library: true.
>>>> FreeTypeFontProvider current updateFromSystem.
>>>> 
>>>> StandardFonts
>>>> setAllStandardFontsTo: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' 
>>>> pointSize: 12);
>>>> haloFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
>>>> windowTitleFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro Bold' 
>>>> pointSize: 12);
>>>> balloonFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
>>>> codeFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Pro' pointSize: 11).
>>>> 
>>>> And then I finally make the window font bold, manually.
>>>> 
>>>> The screenshot was done on Mac OS X 10.9
>>>> 
>>>> HTH,
>>>> 
>>>> Sven
>>>> 
>>>>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013/11/20 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>
>>>>> What version are you using ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> In #30582 it does work:
>>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 13.34.46.png>
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can always try typing a space after Object…
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sven
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:23, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> HI,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> do you know why search behaves like this? I was expecting Object to show 
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <Screenshot 2013-11-20 13.20.40.png>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Uko
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to