I agree with Pavel: having a dark theme is easy. In the end
it is all Smalltalk, so just evaluate
Color black become: Color white
to swap the color objects and then open a new Nautlius. ;)
Have fun
T.
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 um 15:36 Uhr
Von: "Pavel Krivanek" <[email protected]>
An: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Spotlight behaviour
You can get interesting results when you play a little bit with Color class.
It's Smalltalk ;-)
-- Pavel
2013/11/20 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>ok... I will package it and
made it available in the course of the day then.
more hands means faster results :)
Esteban
On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected][[email protected]]>
wrote:
>
> On 20 Nov 2013, at 14:42, Esteban Lorenzano
> <[email protected][[email protected]]> wrote:
>
>> :)
>>
>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 2.40.12 PM.png>
>>
>> I'm slowly working in a darktheme... problem is the INCREDIBLE amount of
>> hardcode colors and silly code.
>> So it will take some time until is ready (also because I work on it when I'm
>> bored and not wanting to do what I should do... like today :P)
>
> Hey, Esteban, that looks already quite impressive.
> I am sure there are some people really anxious to try this and help.
> Is this theme already available somewhere ?
>
>> Esteban
>>
>>
>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:34 PM, kilon alios
>> <[email protected][[email protected]]> wrote:
>>
>>> yes I can confirm that this work also on windoom 7. Indeed Sven your Pharo
>>> looks a bit more sexy than mine.
>>>
>>> the code you posted works also like a charm for me , thank you. Now If I
>>> could get also a dark theme working with pharo that would be awesome. All
>>> this white hurts my eyes. But I guess I will have to compromise for the
>>> time being :)
>>>
>>> thank you
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
>>> <[email protected][[email protected]]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:46, Esteban A. Maringolo
>>> <[email protected][[email protected]]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sven.
>>>>
>>>> What version are YOU using? Fonts and windows look so clean an sharp! :)
>>>
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>> Yes they are.
>>>
>>> Like I said, Pharo version #30582
>>>
>>> defaultFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>> listFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>> menuFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>> windowTitleFont Source Sans Pro Bold points: 12 height: 21
>>> balloonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
>>> codeFont Source Code Pro Normal points: 11 height: 19
>>> buttonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
>>> haloFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
>>>
>>> Installed with a script from our local look and feel guru, Doru:
>>>
>>> #('SourceCodeProRegular' 'SourceCodeProBold' 'SourceSansProRegular'
>>> 'SourceSansProBold’)
>>> do: [ :each |
>>> Smalltalk globals
>>> at: each asSymbol
>>> ifAbsent: [
>>> Gofer new
>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'girba' project: 'FreeFonts';
>>> package: each;
>>> load ].
>>> (Smalltalk at: each asSymbol) new install ].
>>> FreeTypeSystemSettings loadFt2Library: true.
>>> FreeTypeFontProvider current updateFromSystem.
>>>
>>> StandardFonts
>>> setAllStandardFontsTo: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro'
>>> pointSize: 12);
>>> haloFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
>>> windowTitleFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro Bold'
>>> pointSize: 12);
>>> balloonFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
>>> codeFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Pro' pointSize: 11).
>>>
>>> And then I finally make the window font bold, manually.
>>>
>>> The screenshot was done on Mac OS X 10.9
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/11/20 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected][[email protected]]>
>>>> What version are you using ?
>>>>
>>>> In #30582 it does work:
>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 13.34.46.png>
>>>>
>>>> You can always try typing a space after Object…
>>>>
>>>> Sven
>>>>
>>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:23, Yuriy Tymchuk
>>>> <[email protected][[email protected]]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HI,
>>>>>
>>>>> do you know why search behaves like this? I was expecting Object to show
>>>>> up
>>>>>
>>>>> <Screenshot 2013-11-20 13.20.40.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Uko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
