You can get interesting results when you play a little bit with Color
class. It's Smalltalk ;-)

-- Pavel


2013/11/20 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>

> ok... I will package it and made it available in the course of the day
> then.
> more hands means faster results :)
>
> Esteban
>
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 20 Nov 2013, at 14:42, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> :)
> >>
> >> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 2.40.12 PM.png>
> >>
> >> I'm slowly working in a darktheme... problem is the INCREDIBLE amount
> of hardcode colors and silly code.
> >> So it will take some time until is ready (also because I work on it
> when I'm bored and not wanting to do what I should do... like today :P)
> >
> > Hey, Esteban, that looks already quite impressive.
> > I am sure there are some people really anxious to try this and help.
> > Is this theme already available somewhere ?
> >
> >> Esteban
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:34 PM, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> yes I can confirm that this work also on windoom 7. Indeed Sven your
> Pharo looks a bit more sexy than mine.
> >>>
> >>> the code you posted works also like a charm for me , thank you. Now If
> I could get also a dark theme working with pharo that would be awesome. All
> this white hurts my eyes. But I guess I will have to compromise for the
> time being :)
> >>>
> >>> thank you
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:46, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sven.
> >>>>
> >>>> What version are YOU using? Fonts and windows look so clean an sharp!
> :)
> >>>
> >>> ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Yes they are.
> >>>
> >>> Like I said, Pharo version #30582
> >>>
> >>> defaultFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
> >>> listFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
> >>> menuFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
> >>> windowTitleFont Source Sans Pro Bold points: 12 height: 21
> >>> balloonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
> >>> codeFont Source Code Pro Normal points: 11 height: 19
> >>> buttonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21
> >>> haloFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16
> >>>
> >>> Installed with a script from our local look and feel guru, Doru:
> >>>
> >>> #('SourceCodeProRegular' 'SourceCodeProBold' 'SourceSansProRegular'
> 'SourceSansProBold’)
> >>>  do: [ :each |
> >>>    Smalltalk globals
> >>>      at: each asSymbol
> >>>      ifAbsent: [
> >>>        Gofer new
> >>>          smalltalkhubUser: 'girba' project: 'FreeFonts';
> >>>          package: each;
> >>>          load ].
> >>>    (Smalltalk at: each asSymbol) new install ].
> >>> FreeTypeSystemSettings loadFt2Library: true.
> >>> FreeTypeFontProvider current updateFromSystem.
> >>>
> >>> StandardFonts
> >>>  setAllStandardFontsTo: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro'
> pointSize: 12);
> >>>  haloFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
> >>>  windowTitleFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro Bold'
> pointSize: 12);
> >>>  balloonFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9);
> >>>  codeFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Pro' pointSize: 11).
> >>>
> >>> And then I finally make the window font bold, manually.
> >>>
> >>> The screenshot was done on Mac OS X 10.9
> >>>
> >>> HTH,
> >>>
> >>> Sven
> >>>
> >>>> Esteban A. Maringolo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2013/11/20 Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>
> >>>> What version are you using ?
> >>>>
> >>>> In #30582 it does work:
> >>>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 13.34.46.png>
> >>>>
> >>>> You can always try typing a space after Object…
> >>>>
> >>>> Sven
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:23, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> HI,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> do you know why search behaves like this? I was expecting Object to
> show up
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <Screenshot 2013-11-20 13.20.40.png>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>> Uko
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to