oh and Sven just installed flux and tried it, brilliant thanks for the recommendation. Still does not beats dark themes, but certainly helps :) Halogen setting makes it easier to my eyes.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:15 PM, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: > Esteban thats look great to me, I would have gone as far as turing the > background of text editor to pitch black but even this theme is more than > fine for me. So yes it will be wise to post your code to smalltalkhub and > let us help you out with this. I am most certainly be interested to > contribute , dark themes are essential to my coding workflow. > > Sven its not so much about brightness, I find white as color, tiresome , > especially when I read text. The curios thing is that my eyes get strained > only with the white on screen and not on paper, I always have my brightness > at lowest level. But in the end, black is my color. A drak theme is better > because its not just a lower lightness thing its also the correct contast > at least for my eyes. > > About icons its a valid concern, but not a big deal for me right now. > Pharo needs a good theme support, my project will hopefully bring this to > the table but it will take me a lot of time to get there. > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote: > >> btw... my goal is to achieve this: >> >> >> http://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2013/06/11/inside-darcula-look-and-feel-an-interview-with-konstantin-bulenkov/ >> >> (as Phil suggested some time ago, in a thread which was the reason I >> started to try a dark theme). >> >> Also... my intention is to contribute to clean a bit morphic by removing >> silly hardcode stuff and creating a separation betweek "skin" and >> "morph"... and more important, to easy the creation of new skins. >> >> but I still do not find a design that satisfy me... we'll see. >> >> Esteban >> >> On Nov 20, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > ok... I will package it and made it available in the course of the day >> then. >> > more hands means faster results :) >> > >> > Esteban >> > >> > On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On 20 Nov 2013, at 14:42, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> :) >> >>> >> >>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 2.40.12 PM.png> >> >>> >> >>> I'm slowly working in a darktheme... problem is the INCREDIBLE amount >> of hardcode colors and silly code. >> >>> So it will take some time until is ready (also because I work on it >> when I'm bored and not wanting to do what I should do... like today :P) >> >> >> >> Hey, Esteban, that looks already quite impressive. >> >> I am sure there are some people really anxious to try this and help. >> >> Is this theme already available somewhere ? >> >> >> >>> Esteban >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:34 PM, kilon alios <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> yes I can confirm that this work also on windoom 7. Indeed Sven your >> Pharo looks a bit more sexy than mine. >> >>>> >> >>>> the code you posted works also like a charm for me , thank you. Now >> If I could get also a dark theme working with pharo that would be awesome. >> All this white hurts my eyes. But I guess I will have to compromise for the >> time being :) >> >>>> >> >>>> thank you >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:46, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Sven. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> What version are YOU using? Fonts and windows look so clean an >> sharp! :) >> >>>> >> >>>> ;-) >> >>>> >> >>>> Yes they are. >> >>>> >> >>>> Like I said, Pharo version #30582 >> >>>> >> >>>> defaultFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21 >> >>>> listFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21 >> >>>> menuFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21 >> >>>> windowTitleFont Source Sans Pro Bold points: 12 height: 21 >> >>>> balloonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16 >> >>>> codeFont Source Code Pro Normal points: 11 height: 19 >> >>>> buttonFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 12 height: 21 >> >>>> haloFont Source Sans Pro Normal points: 9 height: 16 >> >>>> >> >>>> Installed with a script from our local look and feel guru, Doru: >> >>>> >> >>>> #('SourceCodeProRegular' 'SourceCodeProBold' 'SourceSansProRegular' >> 'SourceSansProBold’) >> >>>> do: [ :each | >> >>>> Smalltalk globals >> >>>> at: each asSymbol >> >>>> ifAbsent: [ >> >>>> Gofer new >> >>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'girba' project: 'FreeFonts'; >> >>>> package: each; >> >>>> load ]. >> >>>> (Smalltalk at: each asSymbol) new install ]. >> >>>> FreeTypeSystemSettings loadFt2Library: true. >> >>>> FreeTypeFontProvider current updateFromSystem. >> >>>> >> >>>> StandardFonts >> >>>> setAllStandardFontsTo: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' >> pointSize: 12); >> >>>> haloFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: 9); >> >>>> windowTitleFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro Bold' >> pointSize: 12); >> >>>> balloonFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Sans Pro' pointSize: >> 9); >> >>>> codeFont: (LogicalFont familyName: 'Source Code Pro' pointSize: 11). >> >>>> >> >>>> And then I finally make the window font bold, manually. >> >>>> >> >>>> The screenshot was done on Mac OS X 10.9 >> >>>> >> >>>> HTH, >> >>>> >> >>>> Sven >> >>>> >> >>>>> Esteban A. Maringolo >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 2013/11/20 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> >> >>>>> What version are you using ? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> In #30582 it does work: >> >>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 13.34.46.png> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> You can always try typing a space after Object… >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sven >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 20 Nov 2013, at 13:23, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> HI, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> do you know why search behaves like this? I was expecting Object >> to show up >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> <Screenshot 2013-11-20 13.20.40.png> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Cheers >> >>>>>> Uko >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >
