On 28 Mar 2014, at 16:17, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> On 28 Mar 2014, at 16:00, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 15:52, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote:
>>
>>> While I was on holiday, it seems my dear friends have gone feature crazy...
>>> almost as bad as me in the run up to the 2.0 release, ha ha.
>>>
>>> As cool as they are, are:
>>> - changing the look of Nautilus buttons
>>> - evaluate arbitrary expressions in Spotlight
>>> - etc, etc
>>> showstopping bugs?!
>>>
>>> This beta time is reserved specifically for finding the bugs that may
>>> inevitably be introduced with these enhancements. We really may be creating
>>> a mess, as end users find them in our "stable" release instead.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, it was wrong… maybe we should revert.
>>
>> Marcus
>
> Yes, maybe ;-)
>
> I don't like the red (ish) / orange rectangle around dirty text areas
> (instead of the orange thing in the corner) - Where did that come from ? Did
> we discuss about that ?
>
I thought that the refactoring of the themes was just a refactoring (not
changing anything).
> <Screen Shot 2014-03-28 at 16.14.56.png>
>
> PS: I marked the 'evaluate arbitrary expressions in Spotlight' not as a bug,
> but an enhancement, with would be nice priority, but indeed for 3.0 - but I
> certainly cannot blame Markus either - and BTW, there was a discussion about
> it, people tested it and nobody said no - and it is a perfectly safe change
> ;-)
>
> PS2: I do have a bit of a problem with people being so vocally against
> changes, unless they are fixing the hard bugs themselves instead. If we all
> do nothing, the release won't get better, right ?
>
>
I know that I will not integrate anything anymore…. I wait till people send
mails to the list to ask to integrate something, and at least 3 people vote
positive.
Marcus
