> > > On 28 Mar 2014, at 16:17, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 28 Mar 2014, at 16:00, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > > > On 28 Mar 2014, at 15:52, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote: > > While I was on holiday, it seems my dear friends have gone feature crazy... > almost as bad as me in the run up to the 2.0 release, ha ha. > > As cool as they are, are: > - changing the look of Nautilus buttons > - evaluate arbitrary expressions in Spotlight > - etc, etc > showstopping bugs?! > > This beta time is reserved specifically for finding the bugs that may > inevitably be introduced with these enhancements. We really may be creating > a mess, as end users find them in our "stable" release instead. > > > > Yes, it was wrong... maybe we should revert. > > Marcus > > > Yes, maybe ;-) > > I don't like the red (ish) / orange rectangle around dirty text areas > (instead of the orange thing in the corner) - Where did that come from ? > Did we discuss about that ? > > > I thought that the refactoring of the themes was just a refactoring (not > changing anything). > > <Screen Shot 2014-03-28 at 16.14.56.png> > > PS: I marked the 'evaluate arbitrary expressions in Spotlight' not as a > bug, but an enhancement, with would be nice priority, but indeed for 3.0 - > but I certainly cannot blame Markus either - and BTW, there was a > discussion about it, people tested it and nobody said no - and it is a > perfectly safe change ;-) > > PS2: I do have a bit of a problem with people being so vocally against > changes, unless they are fixing the hard bugs themselves instead. If we all > do nothing, the release won't get better, right ? > > > > I know that I will not integrate anything anymore.... I wait till people > send mails to the list to ask to integrate something, and at least 3 people > vote positive. > > Marcus > > My fault. The submitted slice had some legitimate Theme bug fixes but > mixed in was flattening of the Theme hierarchy by moving Pharo3Theme to > subclass from UITheme rather than UIThemeWatery. That part was "cleanup" > rather than "bug fix" and I had some concerns which I failed to voice. To > revert that part I've uploaded > SLICE-Issue-13114-Broken-PharoTheme-BenComan.3. Hilaire, Could you review > this to check it looks okay. For overall effect this slice should be > reviewed against build 30802. > http://files.pharo.org/image/30/30802.zip > > -ben >
I'l try that last one as the previous one brings weird effects on Nautilus navigation. I was loading a 30802 and applied several UI-related slices to it and the results weren't pretty. I have done a set of Gofer loads that I'll post later for interested people to test. Phil
