On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 26 Aug 2014, at 10:18, Serge Stinckwich <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >>>> >>> GPL is not compatible with Pharo. All code that is part of the Pharo main >>> distribution >>> is either historical (Apple Licence) or MIT. >>> >>> We even let people sign a document that makes this clear. >>> >>> New code has to be MIT, we do not accept any other license (as part of the >>> main distribution). >>> >>> e.g. Zinc was done because the HTTP server we were using was made GPL (it >>> did not have >>> a licence when we started to use it). >> >> I completely agree with you. This why I was worried with this double >> licencing of spec. >> > > I do not think that you can change a license without getting the OK of all > authors, I guess > it is a mistake in the config of the project.
This is not a mistake, look here: https://github.com/spec-framework/spec/commit/07ea83ca50523b4a912e363ff2f3974c69314b7f -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
