On 26 Aug 2014, at 10:18, Serge Stinckwich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> GPL is not compatible with Pharo. All code that is part of the Pharo main
>> distribution
>> is either historical (Apple Licence) or MIT.
>>
>> We even let people sign a document that makes this clear.
>>
>> New code has to be MIT, we do not accept any other license (as part of the
>> main distribution).
>>
>> e.g. Zinc was done because the HTTP server we were using was made GPL (it
>> did not have
>> a licence when we started to use it).
>
> I completely agree with you. This why I was worried with this double
> licencing of spec.
>
I do not think that you can change a license without getting the OK of all
authors, I guess
it is a mistake in the config of the project.
Marcus
