On 31 Aug 2014, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ps: There is also other versions of GLORP I didn't bless as #stable. > > That seems a bit more complicated: the Glorp ancestry is mixed up, we should > merge this carefully: > > you made versions 86 & 87 while those already existed, the latest 88 skips > your version. > > in any case, 88 now works for me, but I fear it skips your code Ah, I see, this was an intentional branch, right ? Anyway, your addition seems non-intrusive, since it only adds a type, which does not get used unless one specifically asks for it, correct ? If so, I can merge this, commit a new version and update the config. Sven
