Yes... it was intentional. Because there is no "official" maintainer of the GLORP package, I didn't want to add stuff to the main codebase. Same story as with the PostgresV2 package.
Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2014-08-31 19:16 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: > > On 31 Aug 2014, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> ps: There is also other versions of GLORP I didn't bless as #stable. >> >> That seems a bit more complicated: the Glorp ancestry is mixed up, we should >> merge this carefully: >> >> you made versions 86 & 87 while those already existed, the latest 88 skips >> your version. >> >> in any case, 88 now works for me, but I fear it skips your code > > Ah, I see, this was an intentional branch, right ? > > Anyway, your addition seems non-intrusive, since it only adds a type, which > does not get used unless one specifically asks for it, correct ? > > If so, I can merge this, commit a new version and update the config. > > Sven
