I merged your branch and declared the result stable for Pharo 3:

===
Name: Glorp-SvenVanCaekenberghe.89
Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
Time: 2 September 2014, 5:08:03.507586 pm
UUID: 5c4bda4a-9395-4015-b388-c8ce00b65e19
Ancestors: Glorp-MarianoMartinezPeck.88, Glorp-EstebanMaringolo.87

Merging with Esteban Maringolo's branch: adding a #dataAndTime PostgreSQL type 
for Pharo
===
Name: ConfigurationOfGlorp-SvenVanCaekenberghe.38
Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
Time: 2 September 2014, 5:12:20.404014 pm
UUID: a8d54504-7a5a-4a43-92cd-3d66b252611e
Ancestors: ConfigurationOfGlorp-EstebanMaringolo.37

Moved to #stable 1.7 for Pharo 3+
===

On 01 Sep 2014, at 08:06, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 01 Sep 2014, at 00:21, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Yes... it was intentional.
> 
> OK, but what about the second part, about it being non-intrusive ?
> 
>> Because there is no "official" maintainer of the GLORP package, I
>> didn't want to add stuff to the main codebase. Same story as with the
>> PostgresV2 package.
>> 
>> Regards!
>> 
>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-08-31 19:16 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> On 31 Aug 2014, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> ps: There is also other versions of GLORP I didn't bless as #stable.
>>>> 
>>>> That seems a bit more complicated: the Glorp ancestry is mixed up, we 
>>>> should merge this carefully:
>>>> 
>>>> you made versions 86 & 87 while those already existed, the latest 88 skips 
>>>> your version.
>>>> 
>>>> in any case, 88 now works for me, but I fear it skips your code
>>> 
>>> Ah, I see, this was an intentional branch, right ?
>>> 
>>> Anyway, your addition seems non-intrusive, since it only adds a type, which 
>>> does not get used unless one specifically asks for it, correct ?
>>> 
>>> If so, I can merge this, commit a new version and update the config.
>>> 
>>> Sven
>> 
> 


Reply via email to