On 01 Sep 2014, at 00:21, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes... it was intentional. OK, but what about the second part, about it being non-intrusive ? > Because there is no "official" maintainer of the GLORP package, I > didn't want to add stuff to the main codebase. Same story as with the > PostgresV2 package. > > Regards! > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > 2014-08-31 19:16 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: >> >> On 31 Aug 2014, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> ps: There is also other versions of GLORP I didn't bless as #stable. >>> >>> That seems a bit more complicated: the Glorp ancestry is mixed up, we >>> should merge this carefully: >>> >>> you made versions 86 & 87 while those already existed, the latest 88 skips >>> your version. >>> >>> in any case, 88 now works for me, but I fear it skips your code >> >> Ah, I see, this was an intentional branch, right ? >> >> Anyway, your addition seems non-intrusive, since it only adds a type, which >> does not get used unless one specifically asks for it, correct ? >> >> If so, I can merge this, commit a new version and update the config. >> >> Sven >
