On 22.09.2014, at 09:12, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
> > On 22 Sep 2014, at 07:30, Martin McClure <mar...@hand2mouse.com> wrote: > >> Andres and I developed a fix at ESUG for case 11996. The search for >> exception handlers was not taking into account the general case of exception >> handlers established or exceptions signaled while already in a handler >> block, so could find the wrong handler. >> >> I put the slices for this fix in the inbox a while back, but neglected to >> let the list know. >> >> Is there anything else I need to do to get this integrated into 4.0? >> > > it is important to notify about it. There are >600 issues in the tracker, > that means that just solving something but not telling will only lead to > action if > by chance someone looks a the issue tracker entry. (which means, it is very > very unlikely). > > There are two ways to notify: > > 1) putting the issue to “fix review needed” I noticed that I can’t do that (at least not for the issues I haven’t opened myself). Don’t know if that’s a deliberate choice but if you want to delegate a bit of work (and if the behaviour can be changed of course) I suggest that everyone should be able to set that status. > 2) send a mail to the list > > (the second option is good for complex cases) > > Marcius > >
