… *rolling my eyes*… *facepalm*…
On 22.09.2014, at 11:55, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 22 Sep 2014, at 11:21, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Max Leske wrote: >>> >>> On 22.09.2014, at 09:12, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 22 Sep 2014, at 07:30, Martin McClure <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Andres and I developed a fix at ESUG for case 11996. The search for >>>>> exception handlers was not taking into account the general case of >>>>> exception handlers established or exceptions signaled while already in a >>>>> handler block, so could find the wrong handler. >>>>> >>>>> I put the slices for this fix in the inbox a while back, but neglected to >>>>> let the list know. >>>>> >>>>> Is there anything else I need to do to get this integrated into 4.0? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> it is important to notify about it. There are >600 issues in the tracker, >>>> that means that just solving something but not telling will only lead to >>>> action if >>>> by chance someone looks a the issue tracker entry. (which means, it is >>>> very very unlikely). >>>> >>>> There are two ways to notify: >>>> >>>> 1) putting the issue to “fix review needed” >>>> >>> >>> I noticed that I can’t do that (at least not for the issues I haven’t >>> opened myself). Don’t know if that’s a deliberate choice but if you want to >>> delegate a bit of work (and if the behaviour can be changed of course) I >>> suggest that everyone should be able to set that status. >>> >>> >> >> I've never had a problem with that, and I don't think anything special was >> ever done to my account. btw, You do need to click the <Resolve> button to >> get those choices. >> cheers -ben > > yes, there are no special configs… you probably are not pressing “resolve” :) > > Esteban
