On 22 Sep 2014, at 09:21, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 22.09.2014, at 09:12, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2014, at 07:30, Martin McClure <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Andres and I developed a fix at ESUG for case 11996. The search for
>>> exception handlers was not taking into account the general case of
>>> exception handlers established or exceptions signaled while already in a
>>> handler block, so could find the wrong handler.
>>>
>>> I put the slices for this fix in the inbox a while back, but neglected to
>>> let the list know.
>>>
>>> Is there anything else I need to do to get this integrated into 4.0?
>>>
>>
>> it is important to notify about it. There are >600 issues in the tracker,
>> that means that just solving something but not telling will only lead to
>> action if
>> by chance someone looks a the issue tracker entry. (which means, it is very
>> very unlikely).
>>
>> There are two ways to notify:
>>
>> 1) putting the issue to “fix review needed”
>
> I noticed that I can’t do that (at least not for the issues I haven’t opened
> myself). Don’t know if that’s a deliberate choice but if you want to delegate
> a bit of work (and if the behaviour can be changed of course) I suggest that
> everyone should be able to set that status.
I will have a look how to configure that.
Marcus
