On 22 Sep 2014, at 11:21, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > Max Leske wrote: >> >> On 22.09.2014, at 09:12, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On 22 Sep 2014, at 07:30, Martin McClure <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Andres and I developed a fix at ESUG for case 11996. The search for >>>> exception handlers was not taking into account the general case of >>>> exception handlers established or exceptions signaled while already in a >>>> handler block, so could find the wrong handler. >>>> >>>> I put the slices for this fix in the inbox a while back, but neglected to >>>> let the list know. >>>> >>>> Is there anything else I need to do to get this integrated into 4.0? >>>> >>>> >>> it is important to notify about it. There are >600 issues in the tracker, >>> that means that just solving something but not telling will only lead to >>> action if >>> by chance someone looks a the issue tracker entry. (which means, it is very >>> very unlikely). >>> >>> There are two ways to notify: >>> >>> 1) putting the issue to “fix review needed” >>> >> >> I noticed that I can’t do that (at least not for the issues I haven’t opened >> myself). Don’t know if that’s a deliberate choice but if you want to >> delegate a bit of work (and if the behaviour can be changed of course) I >> suggest that everyone should be able to set that status. >> >> > > I've never had a problem with that, and I don't think anything special was > ever done to my account. btw, You do need to click the <Resolve> button to > get those choices. > cheers -ben
yes, there are no special configs… you probably are not pressing “resolve” :) Esteban
