> On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:40, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Indeed, they are not ready for the dark theme. > > As for Pharo-ready, I would rather take the opportunity to create a set of > icons that are Pharo specific. I can try to play with that. > > @Esteban: could you point me to where I should look for the currently used > icons?
current icons are in: EclipseUIThemeIcons and around. but I’m starting to refactorise all that monolithic crap we have now. I was just now discussing an idea (more or less same we discussed before around themes) to solve this (still not completely done…) Esteban > > Cheers, > Doru > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > No, they are not "Pharo ready" in general. I'm working in a change proposal... > > > > On 3 Oct 2014, at 09:30, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Question about those icons, are they DarkTheme ready? I have had to invert >> them all by hand to have something looking nice (and do all kinds of changes >> to be able to read the contents). >> >> Also, as GT is using Rubric, the default black/dark text has to be turned >> into white as well as the cursor color in order to see something. >> >> Phil >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> On a separate note, I played with another variation of a go icon that would >> be more specific to Pharo. Would you like this better? >> >> <go-icon.png> >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I understand. But, even now, you associated Cmd+i as a window action. Is it >> a stretch to see it as a logical action that materializes in different ways? >> >> Doru >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> well, but that’s something that *now* you cannot do. >> what people will see now is “cmd+i does one thing in playground, and other >> thing in other parts of the system". >> For me, that’s not coherent, and introduces a level of pain. >> We are still trying to fix the annoying introduced by nautilus because >> commands are different on it than the rest of the system… I would like to >> avoid that. >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 03 Oct 2014, at 08:17, Tudor Girba <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What if you see it like this: Cmd+i inspects. If you can inspect in place, >>> you do it, otherwise, you inspect in a new window. I know it would require >>> a bit of getting used to, but imagine what will happen when the class >>> browser will allow you to inspect in place ... oops, perhaps I should have >>> not say it loud :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> yes, because it will be "open panel" in playground and "popup an inspector" >>> everyplace else. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Why do you think that the "Cmd+i" option introduces incoherence? >>> >>> Doru >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> you have to pay attention to other lists other than moose, Alex :) >>> nah, seriously: we have been discussing on a remap, because it is >>> conflicting with other keybindings we have in pharo (cmd+o+[others]). >>> >>> For now, we have three proposals: >>> >>> cmd+e “execute” >>> cmd+g “go” >>> cmd+i, and remap gtinspector to cmd+I >>> >>> personally I prefer the second one. >>> the third one looks like a good idea, but it will introduce an incoherence >>> in the system (unless we remap everything, everywhere), so I prefer to >>> stick with “cmd+g” >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> > On 02 Oct 2014, at 23:28, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > It does in the moose image. Pity, this is so useful... >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Alexandre >>> > -- >>> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu <http://www.bergel.eu/> >>> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> >>> >>> "Every thing has its own flow" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> >>> >>> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> > > "Every thing has its own flow"
