> On 03 Oct 2014, at 14:53, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or it can be "Do it and go”.
+1 > > Doru > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Ok. Then how do we call the action? > > I like "gInspect", but that is not useful for > non-deeply-into-the-joke-people. Would "Go" be fine? > > Cheers, > Doru > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > yeah, I can agree with that :) > >> On 03 Oct 2014, at 14:27, Tudor Girba <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I suggest another thing. >> >> We keep Cmd+g as the "ginspect". And when we will work on the next tools >> will add this command when possible. >> >> So, in essence, Cmd+i will become the Cmd+Shift+i from my proposal, and >> Cmd+g will become the Cmd+i from my proposal. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> well… but I still keep my argument: current cmd+i semantics is “popup a new >> inspector”, if we change that *just in the playground”, it will be annoying. >> anyway, looks like opinions are divided: I believe that using cmd+i is bad, >> while the rest of the world believe is the best way to go. >> but since I’m not sure, I’m making a poll to see the general opinion :) >> >> Esteban >> >> > On 03 Oct 2014, at 10:13, Marcus Denker <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 03 Oct 2014, at 10:08, Christophe Demarey <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Le 3 oct. 2014 à 08:26, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : >> >> >> >>> well, but that’s something that *now* you cannot do. >> >>> what people will see now is “cmd+i does one thing in playground, and >> >>> other thing in other parts of the system". >> >> >> >> Maybe it is me but what I see is cmd+i => inspect. >> >> I will be more confused to use cmd+o in GT and cmd+i everywhere else. >> >> >> > >> > another argument: everyone agrees that we open too many windows (*far* too >> > many windows) and that we >> > need to change the IDE to do that less. >> > >> > Now if we declare “every keystroke that used to open a window needs to >> > open a window forever and in all >> > contexts”, then it will be hard to solve the window-plague… >> > >> > Marcus >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> > > "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/> > > "Every thing has its own flow"
