> On 27 Nov 2014, at 16:05, Levente Uzonyi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > >> SmalltalkHub is slow, so don’t click too fast :-( >> >> While I’m grateful to developers of SmalltalkHub and previously >> SqueakSource, I believe as a small community, we cannot afford developing >> everything by ourselves. We don’t have enough man-power. We can see the >> symptoms since SmalltalkHub is in beta stage since way too long... > > People on this list used to say the same about squeaksource.com. But it > has been working flawlessly since it got updated to the latest version > (which implies that a few bugs got fixed). > > What makes you think that tracking down the bugs in SmalltalkHub and fixing > them wouldn't be enough? > > Based on my experience a single image - running well designed software - is > able to serve about ten million requests a day. I think that the actual load > on smalltalkhub.com is about three magnitudes lower than that.
because: 1) the reason why squeaksource survived is because there is an smalltalkhub absorbing most of the packages. 2) I never say it was not possible to keep it running. I said it does not worth the effort, which is a complete different thing. Of course, if someone wants to take smalltalkhub (there is even a configuration for it) and fix the problems that emerge, I will be more than happy to update the production image. Esteban > > Levente > >> >> It’s better to use some mainstream platform such as github. >> We’ll we have support for it in Pharo 4? >> >> It would be interesting also from the communication point of view to make >> the world a little bit more aware of Pharo. >> >> Noury
