2014-11-27 18:01 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: > btw… historic reference: sthub was never intended to be there for stay. I > remember talking about it with Nico and Stef, more than two years ago, > before sthub came online, and our conclusion at the time was: “yes, the > future it will be git, but until we get there, let’s put sthub online > because sqsource cannot handle more projects"
And why you not choose squeaksource3 which maintained by gemstone team and includes all features from old squeaksource? Why you instead develop sthub if you not believe in it?
