stepharo wrote > my impression is that we can focus on better improvements with larger > impact.
+1,000,000. What makes Smalltalk as a language interesting is that, like Lisp, it's one of the few languages where you can fit the entire language on a napkin. I would think extreeeemely hard about the benefits before adding more syntax. If we wanted syntax at the expense of simplicity and uniformity, we'd be using Ruby ;) ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/block-syntax-experiments-tp4830097p4830230.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
