> On 03 Jun 2015, at 15:31, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > stepharo wrote >> my impression is that we can focus on better improvements with larger >> impact. > > +1,000,000. What makes Smalltalk as a language interesting is that, like > Lisp, it's one of the few languages where you can fit the entire language on > a napkin. I would think extreeeemely hard about the benefits before adding > more syntax. If we wanted syntax at the expense of simplicity and > uniformity, we'd be using Ruby ;)
Amen. > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/block-syntax-experiments-tp4830097p4830230.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
