> On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:12, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Francisco Garau
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 3 June 2015 at 05:56, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that would confuse me, and maybe break syntax highlighting.
>>> It *looks* like a message send to nothing.
>>
>>
>> That might be a good thing as there is no object needed to resolve the
>> method lookup. You already have the "method" to evaluate, which is obviously
>> the block.
>>
>> It's a bit heretic, but the more I think, the more I like it.
>
> Well, if its an itch you need to scratch, go ahead :)
> But it might be a struggle to get the community to accept it into
> Pharo, and hence possibly a maintenance burden for you each Pharo
> release.
It would make a nice tutorial how to hack the compiler for experiments…
Marcus