marcus could you log that issue somewhere because I hope that we will get a new Phd working update.

Stef

Le 30/8/15 18:29, Marcus Denker a écrit :
Hi,

All methods (and methods of blocks) that are executing already will keep 
executing the wrong code.

As only offsets change, one could do on-stack replacement of these methods, but 
nobody has implemented that
yet.

It might be good to have a check that warns when changing layout of classes 
that are active on the stack….

On 30 Aug 2015, at 14:49, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:

Yes, but the situation is weird, because if you look at the variable in the 
debugger - everything is ok. Is there a way to understand what has not mutated?

Uko


On 30 Aug 2015, at 13:35, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:

may be code executing the check did not get mutated when the system changed 
shape.

Le 30/8/15 11:00, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 30 Aug 2015, at 10:57, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:

So the byte symbol comes from the “position” inst var of the superclass. I’m 
not completely sure how it works on low level, but I guess that because you a a 
new variable, the others shift and it accesses the value that is actually 
mapped to another variable. Is it the issue of my implementation? How can I 
improve it?

The class builder is normally supposed to fix that transparently: You add var, 
all methods are recompiled and all instances are migrated. There could be bugs 
there.

Uko

On 28 Aug 2015, at 10:50, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:

When I add an iv to Model I get a ByteSymbol>>entity:

QANautilusPluggin>>initialize

  changeHandler := GLMAsyncTask new
      priority: Processor activePriority - 1;
      doInBackground: [ morph entity: self currentEntity ];
      yourself

And in the debugger morph is a a Morph exactly a 
QANautilusPluginMorph(493092864)

Yuriy do you use thread?

Stef










Reply via email to