marcus could you log that issue somewhere because I hope that we will
get a new Phd working update.
Stef
Le 30/8/15 18:29, Marcus Denker a écrit :
Hi,
All methods (and methods of blocks) that are executing already will keep
executing the wrong code.
As only offsets change, one could do on-stack replacement of these methods, but
nobody has implemented that
yet.
It might be good to have a check that warns when changing layout of classes
that are active on the stack….
On 30 Aug 2015, at 14:49, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, but the situation is weird, because if you look at the variable in the
debugger - everything is ok. Is there a way to understand what has not mutated?
Uko
On 30 Aug 2015, at 13:35, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
may be code executing the check did not get mutated when the system changed
shape.
Le 30/8/15 11:00, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 30 Aug 2015, at 10:57, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
So the byte symbol comes from the “position” inst var of the superclass. I’m
not completely sure how it works on low level, but I guess that because you a a
new variable, the others shift and it accesses the value that is actually
mapped to another variable. Is it the issue of my implementation? How can I
improve it?
The class builder is normally supposed to fix that transparently: You add var,
all methods are recompiled and all instances are migrated. There could be bugs
there.
Uko
On 28 Aug 2015, at 10:50, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
When I add an iv to Model I get a ByteSymbol>>entity:
QANautilusPluggin>>initialize
changeHandler := GLMAsyncTask new
priority: Processor activePriority - 1;
doInBackground: [ morph entity: self currentEntity ];
yourself
And in the debugger morph is a a Morph exactly a
QANautilusPluginMorph(493092864)
Yuriy do you use thread?
Stef