Do you think professional developers who use Pharo all day like crashes or 
hangs ? We are all the same here, we want a stable system.

It is not certain that the catalog download is the problem.

This specific feature that you think should only be enabled by those who want 
it (you call them pros) is exactly a beginner's feature: a way to discover 
every external library written. How ironic that you don't care.

Yes, newcomers hit all kinds of issues that more experienced users 
subconsciously avoid, being mindful for that is important. I think we all try 
to do that, by fixing things, not by turning things off.

We lack a proper process to decide these kinds of conflicts.

> On 08 Jul 2016, at 11:21, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> Again again and again: How many times do you see students having Pharo frozen 
> because the internet connection in the classroom is fleaky.
> 
> Apparently turning off these people is not an issue to you. Perfect but it is 
> one for me.
> 
> For your productivity boost why can't you click on one setting and put it on?
> 
> Tell me I do not understand. In my dev image I have several settings set for 
> my own usage.
> 
> So why you cannot have one extra one? Especially since preferences are loaded 
> automatically.
> 
> 
> Then when we will find a way to address the real problem we can just turn the 
> setting on.
> 
> I will have spent half of my life showing software to newbies and may I ask 
> you when is the last time
> 
> you show Pharo to a guy that is learning programming? I do that often (may be 
> too often)
> 
> and in bad situation like in Afrika but not only.
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> 
> Le 6/7/16 à 20:19, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>> I'll try once more to explain.
>> 
>> You like the catalog, don't you ?  It was your idea in the first place. With 
>> this feature you can just type XML, CSV, JSON or whatever and it will 
>> suggest a couple of catalog projects that you can install with just one 
>> click, no need to open any tool you don't even know. This is especially good 
>> for new people. IT IS A FANTASTIC FEATURE, IT IS THE WAY THINGS SHOULD WORK. 
>> It leverages all the work put in the catalog.
>> 
>> Is Spotter or any other part of Pharo perfect ? No.
>> 
>> For many people, Spotter make a huge functional difference, we use it every 
>> minute. If it would hang or block the image even once a day, any of us would 
>> complain loudly.
>> 
>> Conclusion: it works for 99% of the people/cases.
>> 
>> Even in the 1% where there is a problem, it is not 100% sure it is related 
>> to the catalog searching. In the last concrete issue reported, the guy tried 
>> disabling the catalog searching AND IT MADE NO DIFFERENCE !
>> 
>> So again, why turn it off ? It is an overreaction, not engineering.
>> 
>> The underlying problem is that in some very rare, hard to reproduce cases we 
>> cannot reliably detect that there is no network. That's about it.
>> 
>> Note also that almost every application or app today will do some network 
>> calls, this is how the world work - we should be able to do the same with 
>> Pharo, not run away and kill every feature that does a network call.
>> 
>>> On 06 Jul 2016, at 18:14, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Who vote to put it in?
>>> 
>>> Seriously I think that my main concern is about getting Pharo stable in any 
>>> occasion and not giving
>>> 
>>> a bad impression of the system. I takes enough time to build traction and 
>>> such glitches can spoil
>>> 
>>> our effort in no time. "Yes Pharo froze."
>>> 
>>> So it would be nice to care take of such aspect.
>>> 
>>> I do not understand why super users do not manage to put a reference to on 
>>> in the preferences.
>>> 
>>> Sorry esteban but I do not buy your argument that something off is remove. 
>>> No it is off.
>>> 
>>> Stef
>>>>> On 06 Jul 2016, at 09:52, GitHub <nore...@github.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 18674 Turn spotter catalog off by default
>>>>>   https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18674
>>>> We did not agree on this, at all, there was no public discussion, no vote.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to