Hi, I think this is a great idea.
Thanks for opening the issues. Now, the only question is where to put these. You suggest the package Manifest. I think this would work for individual packages, but as we are moving to projects (with Metacello), I would suggest to put these methods in the Configurations. This would also fit from a conceptual encapsulation point of view: loading and unloading are in the same place. What do you think? Doru > On Aug 27, 2016, at 11:00 AM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > > You see hernan doing positively is the best way to make that things happen > > We can have a > > preUnload hook > > Now we should check how it fits with cleanForProduction and others. > > But we should definitively have a way to express this. > > So let us see how we can design it and then just implement it. I'm sure that > GT people are open to such hooks > > and if you really want to get a better Pharo for you then talk to them and us. > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18997/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-in-QA > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18998/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-of-SpecDebugger > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18999/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-in-GT-Debugger > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19000/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-in-GT > > Stef > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."
