> On 6 Mar 2017, at 19:51, stepharong <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> We should make it available from the catalog :)

Yes, it most certainly should be.

If only we could then tell user to type

 Shift-Enter Sublimish Enter 

to install it using Spotter right from the catalog ;-)

Sorry, I couldn't resist ... <ducking>

> 2017-03-06 9:29 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>:
> 
>> On 6 Mar 2017, at 09:22, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2017-03-06 8:20 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> On 6 Mar 2017, at 07:57, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-6.0-Issue-Validator-simple/7294/artifact/report.html
>>>  is not integrated for some Monkey reason anyway - still should b/c if you 
>>> put sublimish, you need a decent matching Spotter.
>>> 
>>> Also, I see 
>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19796/Remove-duplicate-code-from-SublimishTheme
>>>  on 5/3. If this moves forward, why not the other one?
>>> 
>>> BTW Sublimish was an extra thing. Who got that in image?
>> 
>> I don’t know. 
>> It shouldn’t :)
>> 
>> What we should do is to create a page for themes and links to it (and they 
>> should be in catalog) :)
>> 
>> Well, it was me who proposed the slice and yes, I was aware of the fact that 
>> I should not do it because of code freeze (I was not aware of the two themes 
>> policy).
> 
> it is not a policy, it is just the idea I have :)
> 
>> 
>> We can remove it again, I will prepare a slice. 
> 
> problem with it is that is makes ripples. 
> If community want it (is nice), we can include it, but I would wait for P7, 
> yes. 
> 
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19801/Remove-SublimishTheme
> At least it was an advertisement for this theme that moved it forward and the 
> integration of it helped to improve the dark theme too. And showed again how 
> much we need the concept of palettes used strictly in the system.
> 
> -- Pavel
> 
>  
> 
> Esteban
> 
>> 
>> -- Pavel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Esteban
>> 
>>> 
>>> Phil
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 6 Mar 2017, at 07:17, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> First, let me be clear: I *like* sublimish theme (not for my use, but I 
>>>> like it), and I like (a lot) the windows list on spotter, and I like in 
>>>> general all this new additions. 
>>> 
>>> By the way, even if I like it, I would not have integrated SublimishTheme. 
>>> For same reason I didn’t integrated DarkMetalTheme: My idea is to have just 
>>> two themes *in image*: one white, one dark, and allow people to install 
>>> other themes from catalog. 
>>> 
>>> Why? Because each class inside image becomes our responsibility and then a 
>>> maintainability issue. With themes in particular already happened that 
>>> existing themes became abandonware inside the image and we needed to clean 
>>> up, not without problems. 
>>> 
>>> cheers, 
>>> Esteban
>>> 
>>> ps: which means also yes: that issue got integrated because I failed to 
>>> control the flow of issues...
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> And I know, most of those additions are usability enhancements so a good 
>>>> thing.
>>>> 
>>>> But can you guys stop pushing new features into a (in theory) frozen 
>>>> version?
>>>> 
>>>> Pharo 7 will arrive soon… *if* we can fix all things missing. If I can 
>>>> suggest an orientation, it would be good, for those that use linux and mac 
>>>> (windows is not ready), to test and help fix 64bits version. 
>>>> 
>>>> There are still plenty of bugs to fix there, like for example why Spotter 
>>>> does not shows search line. 
>>>> 
>>>> Last week I added support to Athens and SDL2 in 64bits but that meant: 
>>>> 
>>>> - some important changes in UFFI
>>>> - discover something that seems is failing on callbacks for Cairo (no idea 
>>>> if it is a callbacks problem or an image problem that causes a callback 
>>>> problem).
>>>> 
>>>> I would say all this and the fact we are working on 64bits in general 
>>>> deserves a lot of testing. 
>>>> 
>>>> I will add links in Pharo page to download 64bits (I’m at the train now), 
>>>> but in the mean time you can download all from here: 
>>>> 
>>>> http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip
>>>> http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo64-linux-latest.zip (linux)
>>>> http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo64-mac-latest.zip (mac)
>>>> http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/sources.zip (in case you need them)
>>>> 
>>>> cheers, 
>>>> Esteban
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/


Reply via email to