> On 8 Jul 2017, at 09:29, Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter - I just hit this yesterday with your kind help deciphering 
> SmalltalkCI, and I have to confess that "src" was my inclination over 
> repository for the reason you mention in that it is a repository already.
> 
> I noticed other STCi projects have used "packages" .
> 
> I would vote for "src" so other newcomers more easily understand what it is 
> compared to where they came from.

yes, I agree… even if at first is me the one who used mc, I think “src”is 
better convention, now (that’s why pharo is using it :P)

Esteban

> 
> I also think it would be helpful for iceberg to default to using that so we 
> get some consistency?
> 
> Tim
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 7 Jul 2017, at 17:03, Peter Uhnak <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:53:20PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>> 
>>> I though it was already done :)
>>> One notice. Should we all follow standard convention on repo structure?
>>> Because source directory in beacon is called "repository" instead "src"
>>> like in other repos.
>> 
>> There is no standard convention for Pharo repos on github.
>> 
>> In pharo-project I see
>> 
>> * repository 3x
>> * mc 3x
>> * src 1x (not smalltalk code)
>> 
>> And the rest of the github uses a variety of options
>> 
>> * nothing
>>   - imho disorganized and very messy if you have several packages
>> * repository
>>   - I've been using it and recommending it for ~2 years; also used by 
>> filetree and metacello repos ;)
>>   - Argument could be made that git is already a repository so it could be 
>> confusing
>> * mc
>>   - because MontiCello/MetaCello I guess? I don't know how much this makes 
>> sense in the light of Iceberg
>> * src
>>   - quite common in other programming languages
>> * packages
>>   - well, the folder does contain just packages
>> 
>> Someone could mine github to find precise numbers... but current usage 
>> shouldn't be a deciding factor.
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
>>> 
>>> 2017-07-07 16:45 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> I used the git migration tool of Peter Uhnak to migrate Beacon from
>>>> smalltalkhub to github. It is available now here
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-beacon
>>>> 
>>>> I just need to know how I can switch a smalltalkhub project to read-only.
>>>> 
>>>> FYI,
>>>> 
>>>> Norbert
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to