We're using source, because you know in Smalltalk we don't like to invent abbreviations ;)
On Jul 8, 2017 07:18, "Esteban Lorenzano" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 8 Jul 2017, at 09:29, Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Peter - I just hit this yesterday with your kind help deciphering > SmalltalkCI, and I have to confess that "src" was my inclination over > repository for the reason you mention in that it is a repository already. > > > > I noticed other STCi projects have used "packages" . > > > > I would vote for "src" so other newcomers more easily understand what it > is compared to where they came from. > > yes, I agree… even if at first is me the one who used mc, I think “src”is > better convention, now (that’s why pharo is using it :P) > > Esteban > > > > > I also think it would be helpful for iceberg to default to using that so > we get some consistency? > > > > Tim > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On 7 Jul 2017, at 17:03, Peter Uhnak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:53:20PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I though it was already done :) > >>> One notice. Should we all follow standard convention on repo structure? > >>> Because source directory in beacon is called "repository" instead "src" > >>> like in other repos. > >> > >> There is no standard convention for Pharo repos on github. > >> > >> In pharo-project I see > >> > >> * repository 3x > >> * mc 3x > >> * src 1x (not smalltalk code) > >> > >> And the rest of the github uses a variety of options > >> > >> * nothing > >> - imho disorganized and very messy if you have several packages > >> * repository > >> - I've been using it and recommending it for ~2 years; also used by > filetree and metacello repos ;) > >> - Argument could be made that git is already a repository so it could > be confusing > >> * mc > >> - because MontiCello/MetaCello I guess? I don't know how much this > makes sense in the light of Iceberg > >> * src > >> - quite common in other programming languages > >> * packages > >> - well, the folder does contain just packages > >> > >> Someone could mine github to find precise numbers... but current usage > shouldn't be a deciding factor. > >> > >> Peter > >> > >>> > >>> 2017-07-07 16:45 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>>> I used the git migration tool of Peter Uhnak to migrate Beacon from > >>>> smalltalkhub to github. It is available now here > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-beacon > >>>> > >>>> I just need to know how I can switch a smalltalkhub project to > read-only. > >>>> > >>>> FYI, > >>>> > >>>> Norbert > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >
