> Am 09.07.2017 um 12:15 schrieb Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]>: > > Should/could iceberg default to this convention when you create a repo (and > you modify it if you want different?). > Good idea but do we have a convention, yet?
Norbert > It would help us get consistency as when you start out you just don't know > > Tim > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 8 Jul 2017, at 11:17, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On 8 Jul 2017, at 09:29, Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Peter - I just hit this yesterday with your kind help deciphering >>> SmalltalkCI, and I have to confess that "src" was my inclination over >>> repository for the reason you mention in that it is a repository already. >>> >>> I noticed other STCi projects have used "packages" . >>> >>> I would vote for "src" so other newcomers more easily understand what it is >>> compared to where they came from. >> >> yes, I agree… even if at first is me the one who used mc, I think “src”is >> better convention, now (that’s why pharo is using it :P) >> >> Esteban >> >>> >>> I also think it would be helpful for iceberg to default to using that so we >>> get some consistency? >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>>> On 7 Jul 2017, at 17:03, Peter Uhnak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:53:20PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote: >>>>> Hi. >>>>> >>>>> I though it was already done :) >>>>> One notice. Should we all follow standard convention on repo structure? >>>>> Because source directory in beacon is called "repository" instead "src" >>>>> like in other repos. >>>> >>>> There is no standard convention for Pharo repos on github. >>>> >>>> In pharo-project I see >>>> >>>> * repository 3x >>>> * mc 3x >>>> * src 1x (not smalltalk code) >>>> >>>> And the rest of the github uses a variety of options >>>> >>>> * nothing >>>> - imho disorganized and very messy if you have several packages >>>> * repository >>>> - I've been using it and recommending it for ~2 years; also used by >>>> filetree and metacello repos ;) >>>> - Argument could be made that git is already a repository so it could be >>>> confusing >>>> * mc >>>> - because MontiCello/MetaCello I guess? I don't know how much this makes >>>> sense in the light of Iceberg >>>> * src >>>> - quite common in other programming languages >>>> * packages >>>> - well, the folder does contain just packages >>>> >>>> Someone could mine github to find precise numbers... but current usage >>>> shouldn't be a deciding factor. >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-07-07 16:45 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> I used the git migration tool of Peter Uhnak to migrate Beacon from >>>>>> smalltalkhub to github. It is available now here >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-beacon >>>>>> >>>>>> I just need to know how I can switch a smalltalkhub project to read-only. >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI, >>>>>> >>>>>> Norbert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>
