You are right and I like this the most. Will change any repo I see š Norbert
> Am 08.07.2017 um 14:54 schrieb Gabriel Cotelli <[email protected]>: > > We're using source, because you know in Smalltalk we don't like to invent > abbreviations ;) > >> On Jul 8, 2017 07:18, "Esteban Lorenzano" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On 8 Jul 2017, at 09:29, Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Peter - I just hit this yesterday with your kind help deciphering >> > SmalltalkCI, and I have to confess that "src" was my inclination over >> > repository for the reason you mention in that it is a repository already. >> > >> > I noticed other STCi projects have used "packages" . >> > >> > I would vote for "src" so other newcomers more easily understand what it >> > is compared to where they came from. >> >> yes, I agreeā¦ even if at first is me the one who used mc, I think āsrcāis >> better convention, now (thatās why pharo is using it :P) >> >> Esteban >> >> > >> > I also think it would be helpful for iceberg to default to using that so >> > we get some consistency? >> > >> > Tim >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >> On 7 Jul 2017, at 17:03, Peter Uhnak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 04:53:20PM +0200, Denis Kudriashov wrote: >> >>> Hi. >> >>> >> >>> I though it was already done :) >> >>> One notice. Should we all follow standard convention on repo structure? >> >>> Because source directory in beacon is called "repository" instead "src" >> >>> like in other repos. >> >> >> >> There is no standard convention for Pharo repos on github. >> >> >> >> In pharo-project I see >> >> >> >> * repository 3x >> >> * mc 3x >> >> * src 1x (not smalltalk code) >> >> >> >> And the rest of the github uses a variety of options >> >> >> >> * nothing >> >> - imho disorganized and very messy if you have several packages >> >> * repository >> >> - I've been using it and recommending it for ~2 years; also used by >> >> filetree and metacello repos ;) >> >> - Argument could be made that git is already a repository so it could >> >> be confusing >> >> * mc >> >> - because MontiCello/MetaCello I guess? I don't know how much this >> >> makes sense in the light of Iceberg >> >> * src >> >> - quite common in other programming languages >> >> * packages >> >> - well, the folder does contain just packages >> >> >> >> Someone could mine github to find precise numbers... but current usage >> >> shouldn't be a deciding factor. >> >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> >>> >> >>> 2017-07-07 16:45 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> >>>> I used the git migration tool of Peter Uhnak to migrate Beacon from >> >>>> smalltalkhub to github. It is available now here >> >>>> >> >>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-beacon >> >>>> >> >>>> I just need to know how I can switch a smalltalkhub project to >> >>>> read-only. >> >>>> >> >>>> FYI, >> >>>> >> >>>> Norbert >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> > >> > >> >>
