Hi!

> On 9 Sep 2017, at 19:43, Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Esteban,
> 
> 
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 8:04 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On 9 Sep 2017, at 12:28, Henrik Nergaard <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >> but this is still WIP: for example timestamp needs to go to avoid 
>>> >> conflicts.
>>> why/how would this cause conflicts versus other changes?
>> 
>> two people modifying same method could have a marge without conflict, but if 
>> both modify same line (like the timestamp line), then for sure it will be a 
>> conflict :)
> 
> I think this is a serious mistake.  Time stamps and author marks are 
> important (even more important if the unit of commit is a single file for the 
> whole class).  I'm always irritated when Monticello commits carelessly edit a 
> method back instead of reverting, hence lost my the original time stamp.  I 
> want to know who edited a method when so I can ask them for help.  I don't 
> want to see spurious changes.  So making if a conflict and preserving time 
> stamps remains important to me.

thing is: we need to obtain that information in a different way than just put 
it there as text, because of conflicts. But I do not want to lose that 
information either… just get it in a different way.

Esteban

> 
>> 
>> Esteban
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Fra: Pharo-dev <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> på vegne av Esteban Lorenzano 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Sendt: 9. september 2017 11:39:12
>>> Til: Pharo Development List
>>> Emne: Re: [Pharo-dev] About Git support for windows
>>>  
>>> 
>>> > On 8 Sep 2017, at 22:02, Eliot Miranda <[email protected] 
>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Hi All,
>>> > 
>>> >> On Sep 8, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Stephane Ducasse <[email protected] 
>>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> Hi all
>>> >> 
>>> >> At ESUG we discussed with Esteban, martin mcClure, Dale and (many many
>>> >> others :), esteban designed a nice class file format. So that we will
>>> >> not have 2Gb of space on harddisc, problems with long method names and
>>> >> sluggish commits.
>>> > 
>>> > Wow, that's great news!  It'll make it much easier to import from Pharo 
>>> > hit repositories.  Thank you, Esteban!  
>>> > 
>>> > Can someone post the grammar or a description of the syntax asap?
>>> 
>>> I will commit it with a spec next week. 
>>> and I made the parser by hand and simple enough (e.g. I didn’t use 
>>> RBParser)  so it can be ported easily to other dialects. 
>>> 
>>> Esteban 
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> >> 
>>> >> He is waiting at Wien and is probably checking everything right now.
>>> >> 
>>> >> It is a nice format because we will be able to use it to communicate
>>> >> by emails using it. So readable, compact and I like it :)
>>> > 
>>> > Lovely!  Details please :-)
>>> > 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Stef
>>> >> 
>>> > 
>> 

Reply via email to