Hi Stef,

The log is not a replacement of the roadmap. It is only to help people see what 
we do live.

The roadmap and documentation are coming as well, but these are separate.

Cheers,
Doru


> On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:45 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Doru having a few tweets is nice but I do not think that you
> communicate well around bloc.
> 
> What I would like to get is a roadmap for Bloc V1.0.
> - Here are the missing features (documentation),
> - Here are where we are.
> Because else it feels like Bloc will never ends.
> You will argue and tell me that you experiments. But without a feature
> list then
> people cannot join and do not know when you get a 1.0.
> 
> Not measuring is the best way to arrive to a point where you did not wanted.
> 
> You see for Brick we need
>    Button
>    CheckBox
>    DropList
>    List
>    Table
>    Pane
>    InputField
>    Text
>    Scrollbar
>    Menu
> And with that we can get a first Widget set.
> But again without a roadmap I have some doubts.
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Stephane Ducasse
> <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Doru using comma for creating vectors is not really because it will
>> just make the life of type inferencers more difficult.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Our team is working on a couple of projects that are relevant for the core 
>>> of Pharo, namely GT and Bloc/Brick. At ESUG we were asked by several 
>>> people, and Stef in particular, to make the progress on these projects more 
>>> transparent. To this end, we will start two streams of signals:
>>> - fine grained info bits on out Twitter account (several times a week): 
>>> https://twitter.com/feenkcom
>>> - a less often but regular (probably every 2 weeks) activity log message 
>>> sent to this mailing list
>>> 
>>> Please let us know if you see an issue with this.
>>> 
>>> In the meantime, let’s start.
>>> 
>>> Bloc:
>>> - Over the past couple of weeks Alex worked on transformations and 
>>> measurements in the core system. It turns out that there was room for quite 
>>> a number of performance optimizations and for making the system more 
>>> debuggable.
>>> - At the low level, this involved adding matrix and vector support.
>>> https://twitter.com/feenkcom/status/923123870537863168
>>> https://twitter.com/feenkcom/status/916300180848349185
>>> - At a higher level, it implies keeping track of measurements
>>> https://twitter.com/AliakseiSyrel/status/915203525931622400
>>> - And of transformations:
>>> https://twitter.com/feenkcom/status/919603739656417281
>>> https://twitter.com/feenkcom/status/917116164484096001
>>> - The BlScalableElement is now working properly
>>> 
>>> GT Examples:
>>> - The current repository with unary-based examples is at: 
>>> https://github.com/feenkcom/gtoolkit-examples
>>> - We now have a runner in the inspector that allows us to both see the 
>>> source code and run and play with the resulting object:
>>> https://twitter.com/feenkcom/status/923210686204989442
>>> - Andrei made the “after” behavior to work with unary examples.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> The feenk team
>>> 
>>> --
>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>> www.feenk.com
>>> 
>>> "Being happy is a matter of choice."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"What we can governs what we wish."





Reply via email to