On 03.03.2009, at 20:47, Keith Hodges wrote:

> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Keith we understand your point. This is why I proposed to clean
>> Installer and run SmallLint on it.
>> and clean it again (no subclass references in superclass and other).
>>
>> Now did you said the same to Croquet, Sophie, Etoy people?
>> why only to us? Then we have the right not to be happy with your
>> infrastructural choices.
>>
> The croquet people namely (andreas) are on my case, and he clearly  
> gets
> this concept since he based his "running for the board" email on it.
>
> The cobalt people = matthew and others, they "get it", and are using
> some of the tools, and proposing common libraries.
>
> Bertf has expressed an interest in etoys moving up to 3.10+ if the
> transition can be eased.

So interestingly, all these peope never had *any* interest in  
cooperating
on anything.

Etoys ignored 3.9 *completely*. (and all my activity to merge etoys  
back before
that was always done not with that much enthusiasm from their side. I  
got some
bit of help from Bert and Michael, but the activity always came from  
my side).

Andreas disapeared for years (just to pee on us for a good laugh on  
and off).

So I really wonder why they all changed their mind suddenly. Seriously.

        Marcus

--
Marcus Denker  --  [email protected]
http://www.marcusdenker.de


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to