Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > It strikes me (disagree if you feel the need) that Pharo can do all of the > fun-goofy-crazy stuff that people want to protect (at cost) in Squeak. I > forget who it was, but one Squeaker essentially said to me "don't break our > toy." All I wanted was what Pharo is rapidly becoming: a robust system with > good tools and themed feel. You want focus jumping all over - fine, just > make it optional so my users don't have to live with it. Pharo is doing just > that and more. > > This will really stir the pudding in some minds: I think the best thing that > could happen is that Squeak 6.0 == Pharo 3.0 plus packages to do whatever > Squeak needs that Where do you get this Squeak6.0 =Pharo3.0 + packages.
The vision for moving squeak forward has been Squeak Small Kernel + Packages for several years now. If Squeak6.0 (kernel) + packges = Pharo3.0 + packages then I will be a happy person. The problem with it is that Pharo will have a Pharo package system, a Pharo SUinit, a Pharo Compiler, and a Pharo GUI, and none of the packages will work between squeak and pharo. Keith _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
