I was just going to say the same. I have tons of images. Just duplicate an image and you have a new project. No need for a brittle mechanism inside the image.
Cheers, Adrian On Jun 2, 2010, at 08:50 , Lukas Renggli wrote: > I have my different "projects" in different images. That works perfectly. > > Lukas > > On 2 June 2010 08:46, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 on missing projects. >> >> to do what? >> >>> What is our plan to replace this functionality? >> which one exactly? >> >>> Is the objection to the >>> idea of projects in general, or just the Squeak implementation? >> >> I let you guess :) >> >>> I found it absolutely priceless to have a world for each task at hand - each >>> set up for a particular logical task, but having access to all the classes >>> in the system. >> >> well I spent so many hours trying to work with projects for doing demos and >> my botinc book that I can tell you that they can really kill you. >> >> Do you know for example that when you save a project, only the last >> changeset is saved >> with it. Then what happen if in another project you change the exact same >> method? >> since changes do not record changes themselves but just the fact that they >> was a change >> you can be in funny situation. >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
