On 24 November 2010 01:43, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > Definitely use the RB for any code transformations. >
I don't think it's a good option for meta-programming. For meta-programming, basic interface in Behavior or ClassDescription should be enough for manipulating with methods, without dependency from RB. Actually, RB then can use same API for manipulations. > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 23 Nov 2010, at 19:01, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> Cyrille I don't know why you need that but take into account that RB split >> their packages even more in the last months. So maybe it is easier for you >> to directly use RB and load with your code, the RB core or the specific >> package that you need. Mostly if you need some other similar functionalities. >> >> Cheers >> >> Mariano >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jaayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> ---- On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:17:05 -0800 Cyrille Delaunay wrote ---- >> >> >Hello, >> > >> >I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically and safelly >> >(without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) >> > >> >> I don't believe there is any simple way to do this. >> >> Basically, to rename a method you have to remove it first and compile into >> its class a new method containing the same source code but with a different >> selector at the beginning. This is how the refactory browser does it when >> you select "rename" from the "refactor method" menu. If anyone knows of a >> better way, I would be interested to hear it. >> >> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen." > > > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
