I was also referring to a programatic solution :). Perhaps the name is misleading, but RB is not the UI. RB is primarily the engine behind that contains the logic of performing a refactoring.
Doru On 24 Nov 2010, at 09:17, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > Indeed, in my case I would like to do that wihtout using UI. I want to write > a test in which I rename a method and see if the events emited have been > well-catched by RPackage. > > 2010/11/24 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> > On 24 November 2010 02:00, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, as long as you want to perform a refactoring I believe that RB > > provides the API in question. > > > Yes, of course. But question was 'how to do that programmatically' , > not using browser or other UI. > > > Doru > > > > > > On 24 Nov 2010, at 00:52, Igor Stasenko wrote: > > > >> On 24 November 2010 01:43, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Definitely use the RB for any code transformations. > >>> > >> > >> I don't think it's a good option for meta-programming. > >> For meta-programming, basic interface in Behavior or ClassDescription > >> should be enough for manipulating > >> with methods, without dependency from RB. > >> Actually, RB then can use same API for manipulations. > >> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Doru > >>> > >>> > >>> On 23 Nov 2010, at 19:01, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >>> > >>>> Cyrille I don't know why you need that but take into account that RB > >>>> split their packages even more in the last months. So maybe it is easier > >>>> for you to directly use RB and load with your code, the RB core or the > >>>> specific package that you need. Mostly if you need some other similar > >>>> functionalities. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers > >>>> > >>>> Mariano > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jaayer <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ---- On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:17:05 -0800 Cyrille Delaunay wrote ---- > >>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically and > >>>>> safelly (without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I don't believe there is any simple way to do this. > >>>> > >>>> Basically, to rename a method you have to remove it first and compile > >>>> into its class a new method containing the same source code but with a > >>>> different selector at the beginning. This is how the refactory browser > >>>> does it when you select "rename" from the "refactor method" menu. If > >>>> anyone knows of a better way, I would be interested to hear it. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>> > >>> "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen." > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > >> > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be > > done." > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem understanding."
