If someone wants to know, this is the I'm doing it: refactoring := RenameMethodRefactoring renameMethod: #oldMethodMethod in: class to: #newMethod permutation: (#()). refactoring execute.
2010/11/24 Cyrille Delaunay <[email protected]> > Ok, thank you :) > > 2010/11/24 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> > > >> >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I was also referring to a programatic solution :). Perhaps the name is >>> misleading, but RB is not the UI. RB is primarily the engine behind that >>> contains the logic of performing a refactoring. >>> >>> >> Exactlly. The UI can be OB-Refactory, or Gaucho, or just programatic. >> >> >>> Doru >>> >>> On 24 Nov 2010, at 09:17, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >>> >>> > Indeed, in my case I would like to do that wihtout using UI. I want to >>> write a test in which I rename a method and see if the events emited have >>> been well-catched by RPackage. >>> > >>> > 2010/11/24 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> >>> > On 24 November 2010 02:00, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > Well, as long as you want to perform a refactoring I believe that RB >>> provides the API in question. >>> > > >>> > Yes, of course. But question was 'how to do that programmatically' , >>> > not using browser or other UI. >>> > >>> > > Doru >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 24 Nov 2010, at 00:52, Igor Stasenko wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> On 24 November 2010 01:43, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> Definitely use the RB for any code transformations. >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> I don't think it's a good option for meta-programming. >>> > >> For meta-programming, basic interface in Behavior or >>> ClassDescription >>> > >> should be enough for manipulating >>> > >> with methods, without dependency from RB. >>> > >> Actually, RB then can use same API for manipulations. >>> > >> >>> > >>> Cheers, >>> > >>> Doru >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On 23 Nov 2010, at 19:01, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>>> Cyrille I don't know why you need that but take into account that >>> RB split their packages even more in the last months. So maybe it is easier >>> for you to directly use RB and load with your code, the RB core or the >>> specific package that you need. Mostly if you need some other similar >>> functionalities. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Cheers >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Mariano >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jaayer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> ---- On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:17:05 -0800 Cyrille Delaunay wrote >>> ---- >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>>> Hello, >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically >>> and safelly (without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> I don't believe there is any simple way to do this. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Basically, to rename a method you have to remove it first and >>> compile into its class a new method containing the same source code but with >>> a different selector at the beginning. This is how the refactory browser >>> does it when you select "rename" from the "refactor method" menu. If anyone >>> knows of a better way, I would be interested to hear it. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> -- >>> > >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> > >>> >>> > >>> "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen." >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> Best regards, >>> > >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > www.tudorgirba.com >>> > > >>> > > "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot >>> be done." >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Best regards, >>> > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem >>> understanding." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
