RB has NOTHING to do with a UI or with a Browser. Actually, it is very well splitted in packages, and I think you can just use RB with a simple api "programmatically".
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Cyrille Delaunay <[email protected]>wrote: > Indeed, in my case I would like to do that wihtout using UI. I want to > write a test in which I rename a method and see if the events emited have > been well-catched by RPackage. > > 2010/11/24 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> > > On 24 November 2010 02:00, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Well, as long as you want to perform a refactoring I believe that RB >> provides the API in question. >> > >> Yes, of course. But question was 'how to do that programmatically' , >> not using browser or other UI. >> >> > Doru >> > >> > >> > On 24 Nov 2010, at 00:52, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> > >> >> On 24 November 2010 01:43, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Definitely use the RB for any code transformations. >> >>> >> >> >> >> I don't think it's a good option for meta-programming. >> >> For meta-programming, basic interface in Behavior or ClassDescription >> >> should be enough for manipulating >> >> with methods, without dependency from RB. >> >> Actually, RB then can use same API for manipulations. >> >> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Doru >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 23 Nov 2010, at 19:01, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Cyrille I don't know why you need that but take into account that RB >> split their packages even more in the last months. So maybe it is easier for >> you to directly use RB and load with your code, the RB core or the specific >> package that you need. Mostly if you need some other similar >> functionalities. >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers >> >>>> >> >>>> Mariano >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jaayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ---- On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:17:05 -0800 Cyrille Delaunay wrote ---- >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hello, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically and >> safelly (without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I don't believe there is any simple way to do this. >> >>>> >> >>>> Basically, to rename a method you have to remove it first and compile >> into its class a new method containing the same source code but with a >> different selector at the beginning. This is how the refactory browser does >> it when you select "rename" from the "refactor method" menu. If anyone knows >> of a better way, I would be interested to hear it. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> www.tudorgirba.com >> >>> >> >>> "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen." >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > www.tudorgirba.com >> > >> > "Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be >> done." >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >> >> >
