On 14 February 2012 17:07, Guido Stepken <gstep...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 14.02.2012 16:57, schrieb Igor Stasenko: > >> On 14 February 2012 15:07, Hernan Wilkinson >> <hernan.wilkin...@10pines.com> wrote: >>> >>> Well... this is an example of what the "thread" was about at the >>> beginning... that is, the lack of knowledge on software development... I >>> you >>> have known a little bit about architecture, multi-threading and vm >>> implementation, you would quickly realize that pharo will not scale as a >>> server. Squeak (where pharo comes from) was not design/implemented to be >>> used as a server (and please, don not take this bad, I don't want to >>> be unworthy with Pharo because it is changing and getting better with >>> every >>> realease) >>> >> There's no reason to take it bad, because you stating the truth. >> >>> So, if you want to do a "serious enterprise" application, you should have >>> used and architecture prepare for that such as GemStone (GLASS in this >>> case)... it is a pity you lost so much money due to you "lack" of >>> knowledge. >>> >> People who taking it serious also first discover the area of possibility, >> which implies talking to people and asking questions. >> >> I never seen from Guido questions like "does it scales if i run it >> standalone etc". >> And that means that he's not any serious with his harsh statements, >> just trolling. >> > > Lookup Google "Pharo hanging" ... very few companies are really using Pharo, > but i am not the only one reporting this. > Look for "rails hanging" - ~ 11 million hits Look for "C# hanging" , java hanging etc
now if this is the only criteria, on which you basing your choice, then i feel sorry for you, because you cannot use any software made in this world. so, have fun hacking. > Tnx for the "troll". > > Have fun hacking, Guido Stepken > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
