On 17 June 2012 01:30, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Igor Stasenko wrote >> >> because 'announcer weak subscribe: ' is explicit >> > > Either way, something is implicit. Why not make the common case implicit and > the uncommon one slightly more verbose? "Make common things easy, rare > things possible" > I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by this change (oh... its really hard to make everyone happy).
As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell their intent.. i.e. if they want to subscribe strongly, then they should say: announcer strong on:.. and weakly, is announcer weak on:.. but if they do: announcer on: they shall get a DNU/error. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
