On 17 June 2012 15:09, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Igor Stasenko wrote >> >> I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by >> this change > Yes, but 2.0 is changing *alot*, so this is a good time to sneak this in :) > Like pulling off a BandAid... the best thing to do is pull fast and get it > over with. > > > Igor Stasenko wrote >> >> As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell >> their intent > That would be an improvement... Also, what's the status of this limitation > (http://forum.world.st/Unsubscribing-for-Announcements-tp3220751p4082565.html) > : > > when:do: anActionBlock subscription does >> not work weakly, you are constrained to when:send:to > > IIUC it was waiting on ephemerons > (http://forum.world.st/Working-with-weak-announcements-td3305802.html) >
yes. we can add Ephemerons at any moment now. But then people should use only VMs built on Jenkins, because Eliot's VMs not support them. > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Why-don-t-we-always-register-weakly-in-SystemAnnouncer-tp4635140p4635193.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
