On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 June 2012 15:09, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Igor Stasenko wrote > >> > >> I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by > >> this change > > Yes, but 2.0 is changing *alot*, so this is a good time to sneak this in > :) > > Like pulling off a BandAid... the best thing to do is pull fast and get > it > > over with. > > > > > > Igor Stasenko wrote > >> > >> As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell > >> their intent > > That would be an improvement... Also, what's the status of this > limitation > > ( > http://forum.world.st/Unsubscribing-for-Announcements-tp3220751p4082565.html > ) > > : > > > > when:do: anActionBlock subscription does > >> not work weakly, you are constrained to when:send:to > > > > IIUC it was waiting on ephemerons > > (http://forum.world.st/Working-with-weak-announcements-td3305802.html) > > > > yes. we can add Ephemerons at any moment now. But then people should > use only VMs built > on Jenkins, because Eliot's VMs not support them. > I wish you would reconsider and reimplement VM ephemeron support using the format field as we discussed not the class hack you've implemented which is I think buggy and unsafe. > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Why-don-t-we-always-register-weakly-in-SystemAnnouncer-tp4635140p4635193.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > > -- best, Eliot
