Igor Stasenko wrote > > I bet if you do that, some people will be alienated/antagonized by > this change Yes, but 2.0 is changing *alot*, so this is a good time to sneak this in :) Like pulling off a BandAid... the best thing to do is pull fast and get it over with.
Igor Stasenko wrote > > As a compromise i would suggest to force people to explicitly tell > their intent That would be an improvement... Also, what's the status of this limitation (http://forum.world.st/Unsubscribing-for-Announcements-tp3220751p4082565.html) : when:do: anActionBlock subscription does > not work weakly, you are constrained to when:send:to IIUC it was waiting on ephemerons (http://forum.world.st/Working-with-weak-announcements-td3305802.html) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Why-don-t-we-always-register-weakly-in-SystemAnnouncer-tp4635140p4635193.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
