yes, you're right, but Norbert point is that, right now, you cannot fork the project (and you should be able to do it)
Esteban On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Sebastian Sastre <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there an explanation why in smalltalkhub every project resides below a >> user? > > > because things in this universe don't get done if someone isn't leading it? :D > > the leader of any project is (a) the curator of that project and (b) the one > positioned to better inspire followers > > if people likes it, people follows the project and/or the guy > > if someone doesn't like the direction, that person can fork and lead it > himself in another direction > > github got it right, I'm glad smalltalkhub too > > and it's not about mimicking github (which wouldn't be bad) it's mimicking > the way people want to work > > it's about natural selection applied to software projects at its best > > makes sense? > > sebastian > > o/ > > PD: if someone abandons a project, no big deal, it will be there hanging out > while another fork might be flourishing. Also projects property should be > transferrable from one user to another for the cases in which that happens > orderly. > >
