we need the fork feature then very important
biology is: (a) mutation (b) natural selection we already have b, forking would give us a sebastian o/ On Nov 22, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > yes, you're right, but Norbert point is that, right now, you cannot fork the > project (and you should be able to do it) > > Esteban > > On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Sebastian Sastre <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Is there an explanation why in smalltalkhub every project resides below a >>> user? >> >> >> because things in this universe don't get done if someone isn't leading it? >> :D >> >> the leader of any project is (a) the curator of that project and (b) the one >> positioned to better inspire followers >> >> if people likes it, people follows the project and/or the guy >> >> if someone doesn't like the direction, that person can fork and lead it >> himself in another direction >> >> github got it right, I'm glad smalltalkhub too >> >> and it's not about mimicking github (which wouldn't be bad) it's mimicking >> the way people want to work >> >> it's about natural selection applied to software projects at its best >> >> makes sense? >> >> sebastian >> >> o/ >> >> PD: if someone abandons a project, no big deal, it will be there hanging out >> while another fork might be flourishing. Also projects property should be >> transferrable from one user to another for the cases in which that happens >> orderly. >> >> >
