We should keep in mind that Smalltalkhub is still under development :) And our poor Nicolas is running out of time (too many things to do) :D
Ben On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > team support is coming soon :) > > On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> And what happens where is isnt't ONE gay? say there are 3 or 4 guys in the >> community that manage the project? what should we do? create a user named >> after the project? hahaha >> >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> yes, you're right, but Norbert point is that, right now, you cannot fork the >> project (and you should be able to do it) >> Esteban >> >> >> On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Sebastian Sastre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> Is there an explanation why in smalltalkhub every project resides below a >>>> user? >>> >>> >>> because things in this universe don't get done if someone isn't leading it? >>> :D >>> >>> the leader of any project is (a) the curator of that project and (b) the >>> one positioned to better inspire followers >>> >>> if people likes it, people follows the project and/or the guy >>> >>> if someone doesn't like the direction, that person can fork and lead it >>> himself in another direction >>> >>> github got it right, I'm glad smalltalkhub too >>> >>> and it's not about mimicking github (which wouldn't be bad) it's mimicking >>> the way people want to work >>> >>> it's about natural selection applied to software projects at its best >>> >>> makes sense? >>> >>> sebastian >>> >>> o/ >>> >>> PD: if someone abandons a project, no big deal, it will be there hanging >>> out while another fork might be flourishing. Also projects property should >>> be transferrable from one user to another for the cases in which that >>> happens orderly. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mariano >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> >
